[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack
From: |
Erich Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:23:50 +0100 (CET) |
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Jeff Kingston wrote:
>My long term solution to all these problems is to resign my job, which
>I will be doing in August (yes, I've handed in my resignation letter),
>and to spend three years at least producing an entirely new document
>formatting system.
Excuse me, does that mean the end of lout, or will there be a sort of
compatibility? (E.g. similiar syntax or symbols & requests.) Your
*entirely new* make me doubt.
erich
ps.
Hope your decisions are right for you and you're leaving your job
freely and with chances for something suitable. Good luck!
- sugestion for Lout - token stack, Basile STARYNKEVITCH, 2002/03/22
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Jeff Kingston, 2002/03/22
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack,
Erich Hoffmann <=
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Oliver Bandel, 2002/03/24
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Jeff Kingston, 2002/03/24
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Oliver Bandel, 2002/03/25
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Giovanni Zezza, 2002/03/25
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Oliver Bandel, 2002/03/30
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Giovanni Zezza, 2002/03/31
- Jeff's new programming language (Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack), Oliver Bandel, 2002/03/30