lout-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Lout *not* dead!


From: Daren Scot Wilson
Subject: Lout *not* dead!
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 18:44:09 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0

Lout is certainly not dead for me. I have been using it as recently as yesterday, to write a report. I find it so much easier to get started, and to fuss things into the shape I want, ending with making a PDF to send to everyone or upload to some archive, than to use LaTeX or a WYSIWYG word processor.

Mostly I write internal technical reports concerning proprietary technology and algorithms, so I have little to show the public for it. But Lout is getting plenty of use by me.

If Lout happens to be so good that it needs no improvement, then so what if there haven't been many updates the last couple years? Though it would be nice to see packages for specialized typesetting - sheet music, chemistry, choreography, etc - be created and published. That takes a certain amount of usage and attention from the world, and someon with the motivation and free time to make a package. Maybe Lout hasn't quite arced high enough for that to happen, but it is far from dead or dying for the things it can to out of the box.

--
Daren Scot Wilson
Gresham Oregon
720-253-2646
address@hidden
http://www.darenscotwilson.com
http://wigglewave.wordpress.com
http://toysihad.wordpress.com
http://stackexchange.com/users/6259/darenw




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]