ltib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltib] Problems with Ltib as delivered via a Freescale package.


From: John Clark
Subject: Re: [Ltib] Problems with Ltib as delivered via a Freescale package.
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:30:03 -0700

On May 26, 2012, at 4:20 AM, Petteri Matilainen wrote:

> Hi John,
> 
> I had the same problems as you with MCF5485 ltib from Freescale. And I also 
> have debian.
> 
> With zlib I just commented the check out from ltib script (zlib was 
> installed). I don't remember if I had the glibc-devel problem as well.
> 
> I also had the same issue with sparse. As suggested by some other forum or 
> blog, there is two options. You can remove the reference to the wrong struct 
> from the sparse source. I tried this but couldn't remove the right one. So, I 
> got a new sparse source from the net and replaced the old one in ltib. The 
> new sparse has the duplicate struct removed.
> 
> First you have to find the directory containing the sparse-0.4.tar.gz (or 
> something like that) and an MD5 sum file sparse-0.4.tar.gz.md5. Delete the 
> old one (or copy it to a backup folder just in case along with the md5 sum 
> file). Copy the new one in the same place. As it's a different version, you 
> have to re-create the md5 sum file, otherwise ltib will complain it's missing.
> 
> I can't remember if I just renamed the new sparse (0.4.3 or something) to 
> sparse-0.4 and re-created the md5sum or was there something else to be done. 
> I hope this helps. Also, in the newest ltib from freescale there still is the 
> old sparse so it has to be upgraded manually.
> 
> regards
> 
> Petteri



Thanks, that got me further, but now I have a 404 message when some 'package' 
is being downloaded from the 'bitshrine.org/gpp' site...

This is one of the worse 'open source' package setups I have seen in quite a 
while, ranging from using RPM's to having packages on a site where there is no 
other access it seems other than with a specific file name, and the 'installer' 
seems to not place things in the correct directories... I'm working on a kernel 
patch, that seems to be in the ISO image 'pkgs' folder, but doesn't seem to get 
to the right place for the ltib build activity.

John.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]