[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5
From: |
Peter Graf |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:03:00 -0000 |
Hi Adam,
>New sys_arch interface for lwIP 0.5 (Request For Comments)
>
>[...]
My comment: Fine :-) Thanks a lot.
When describing sys_arch_mbox_fetch(), you say:
"The msg parameter maybe NULL to indicate that the message should be dropped."
Here it might help to add
"... should be dropped by the caller of sys_arch_mbox_fetch()".
Otherwise someone may think that sys_arch_mbox_fetch() itself is supposed
to check for msg==NULL, drop the message, and keep on blocking.
Peter
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5,
Peter Graf <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Peter Graf, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Phil Dempster, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Peter Graf, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Peter Graf, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Peter Graf, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Phil Dempster, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Peter Graf, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] RFC - new sys_arch for lwIP 0.5, Phil Dempster, 2003/01/09