[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] LWIP Patches and CVS [contact with Adam]

[Scott Robinson]

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sure, I'll send the tree over!

I haven't added the patches queued in my home directory (heh) because I'm
away from the machine at the moment. You could as easily import the current
tree.

I've noticed your company homepage. Are you guys dealing in commercial
TCP/IP stacks? What is the interest in lwip?

Not that it's a high bandwidth project or anything. ;-)

Scott.

* Troy (Office PC) translated into ASCII [Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:02:00PM -=
0700][<address@hidden>]
> Send over the tree to address@hidden
>=20
> We have a uro already for it.  The url will be nexgentcpip.com
>=20
> I just bought this so we could have a nice front page interface.  We are
> ready.
>=20
> Troy Melquist Founder
> REDCELLX SOFTWARE
> www.redcellx.com
> 408 SW 2nd ave
> suite 412
> Portland Oregon 97204 USA
> 503 295 9680
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Rod
> Boyce
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [lwip] LWIP Patches and CVS [contact with Adam]
>=20
> I would respectful ask that not everybody who produces a diff has CVS
> write access.  I think there needs to be some gating process as I do not
> think all diffs are created equal. =20
>=20
> lwip and its baby brother are great I think there needs to be a gating
> process so caos does not end up bring king.
>=20
> Perhaps there should only be a hand full of active people on this list
> that have CVS write access.  These people do not have to test every
> single patch just when there is agreement that a patch should be added
> to the head should it be added.
>=20
> This is just my $0.02 cents worth.
>=20
> Regards,
> Rod Boyce.
>=20
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:57:53 -0700
> Scott Robinson <address@hidden> wrote:
>=20
> > Well, then I guess SF and Savannah aren't accepting it. Florian noted
> the
> > license may have already been changed, and the last nightly CVS I
> downloaded
> > seems to confirm that statement. Perhaps someone should ask again?
> >=20
> > Anyway, I already volunteered server space. It's up to people here if
> they
> > really want to use it.
> >=20
> > I will open my anon CVS open later tonight with preliminary accounts
> for
> > anyone who offers what look like coherent patches. Just give me a
> yell!
> > Setting up a CVS patch mailing list is something else, though...
> >=20
> > Troy, if your CTO ends up allowing you guys to set it up, I'll be able
> to
> > send you a CVS tree (.tgz format) with a few of the patches in mailing
> list
> > archives already applied.
> >=20
> > Scott.
> >=20
> > * Troy (Office PC) translated into ASCII [Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at
> 05:46:30PM -0700][<address@hidden>]
> > > Let me talk to our CTO about setting up something. =20
> > >=20
> > > Troy Melquist Founder
> > > REDCELLX SOFTWARE
> > > www.redcellx.com
> > > 408 SW 2nd ave
> > > suite 412
> > > Portland Oregon 97204 USA
> > > 503 295 9680
> > >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
> Leon
> > > Woestenberg
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:40 PM
> > > To: address@hidden
> > > Subject: Re: [lwip] LWIP Patches and CVS [contact with Adam]
> > >=20
> > > Hello all,
> > >=20
> > > a few weeks ago I have had contact with Adam about setting up a
> public
> > > CVS
> > > on http://savanah.nongnu.org (note the nongnu) or
> > > http://www.sourceforge.net/
> > >=20
> > > Adam was enthousiastic about it, as he was currently involved in a
> new
> > > project
> > > at SICS. (Winternet", http://winternet.sics.se/). I can quote his
> > > response
> > > tomorrow
> > > when I am at my work place again.
> > >=20
> > > Both Savannah and Sourceforge acceptation teams rejected lwIP
> because of
> > > the
> > > "original BSD" license.
> > >=20
> > > After this, I have asked Adam if it was possible to blend to the
> > > "official
> > > modified BSD"
> > > license, but I have had no response on this. (This was 1 or 2 weeks
> > > ago).
> > > Probably,
> > > such things have to go through SICS lawyers "layer" anyway.
> > >=20
> > > (In short, the original BSD license was modified by the director of
> > > Berkeley
> > > University
> > > as statement #3 was ambigious in the sense of "contributors").
> > >=20
> > > So, either the license be modified according to this, or someone
> should
> > > set
> > > up a CVS
> > > server on their _own server_ so that we can proceed with the current
> > > license
> > > without
> > > legal trouble.
> > >=20
> > > Can someone do this? It might be the most viable option.
> > >=20
> > > Regards,
> > >=20
> > > Leon Woestenberg.
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > > >
> > > > > If not, I am thinking about setting up a temporary public CVS
> which
> > > people
> > > > > can submit patches for/commit to... (Paul is one person who
> seems to
> > > know
> > > > > his stuff)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using lwIP in my main project right now, and until the
> project
> > > is
> > > > > converted over to SF.net, it would be nice to know that there is
> at
> > > least
> > > > > one comprehensive source for updated/reduced bug code.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > > i don't know if it is a good idea for my patches to go in
> directly,
> > > > since i don't use lwip via the lwip api, but from the low level
> api.
> > > > my patches are untested in this respect, so they should go through
> > > > someone who is using lwip standalone, and using lwip with threads
> etc.
> > > >
> > > > i am quite prepared to help maintain lwip if api/*.c stuff is
> > > > dropped, or at least someone can verify that it still works
> > > > after i apply patches
> > > >
> > > > perhaps go ahead and get the cvs up and cc the announcement to
> > > > adam. if he is not responding to mail, perhaps someone in europe
> > > > could just phone him to let him know we are stealing his
> > > > project  :-)
> > > >
> > > > in any case he will always have cvs write access of course
> > > >
> > > > -paul
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
> > > >
> > >=20
> > > [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
> > >=20
> > > [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
> >=20
> > --=20
> > http://quadhome.com/           - Personal webpage
> > tranzoa.net                    - Firewall
> >=20
> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.12
> > GAT dpu s: a--- C++ UL+++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N++ o+ K++ w++=20
> > O M V(-) PS+ PE Y+ PGP+++ t@ 5 X- R- tv(-) b++++ DI++++ D+=20
> > G e* h! r* y=20
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> >=20
> [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
>=20
> [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]

--=20
http://quadhome.com/           - Personal webpage
tranzoa.net                    - Firewall

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GAT dpu s: a--- C++ UL+++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N++ o+ K++ w++=20
O M V(-) PS+ PE Y+ PGP+++ t@ 5 X- R- tv(-) b++++ DI++++ D+=20
G e* h! r* y=20
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAj2vJOAACgkQ+1+mlYgeODczVACgqnU4EuQmkU0W8ldCuQL0+Vfz
pCcAn0ry/M+vcGSuxGQLCgBsg5Amp0qR
=q9Qh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]