[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] LWIP Patches and CVS [contact with Adam]

[Scott Robinson]

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Interesting.=20

:pserver:address@hidden/var/lib/cvs MODULE "lwip" is available built
off the current nighty CVS dump.

Well, I'm not one to look a gift horse in the mouth. If you guys wants to
host it permanently, then do so!

I would like access to it, or have a place to send patches .. at the very
least.

Scott.

* Troy (Office PC) translated into ASCII [Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:50:54PM -=
0700][<address@hidden>]
> Ok folks.  We got a access line and CVS set up on a server for all.
> Does any one want this to be a go or not?
> If so contact address@hidden
> He is the guy who can do this.  And it can be done now!
>=20
> Troy Melquist Founder
> REDCELLX SOFTWARE
> www.redcellx.com
> 408 SW 2nd ave
> suite 412
> Portland Oregon 97204 USA
> 503 295 9680
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Rod
> Boyce
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [lwip] LWIP Patches and CVS [contact with Adam]
>=20
> I would respectful ask that not everybody who produces a diff has CVS
> write access.  I think there needs to be some gating process as I do not
> think all diffs are created equal. =20
>=20
> lwip and its baby brother are great I think there needs to be a gating
> process so caos does not end up bring king.
>=20
> Perhaps there should only be a hand full of active people on this list
> that have CVS write access.  These people do not have to test every
> single patch just when there is agreement that a patch should be added
> to the head should it be added.
>=20
> This is just my $0.02 cents worth.
>=20
> Regards,
> Rod Boyce.
>=20
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:57:53 -0700
> Scott Robinson <address@hidden> wrote:
>=20
> > Well, then I guess SF and Savannah aren't accepting it. Florian noted
> the
> > license may have already been changed, and the last nightly CVS I
> downloaded
> > seems to confirm that statement. Perhaps someone should ask again?
> >=20
> > Anyway, I already volunteered server space. It's up to people here if
> they
> > really want to use it.
> >=20
> > I will open my anon CVS open later tonight with preliminary accounts
> for
> > anyone who offers what look like coherent patches. Just give me a
> yell!
> > Setting up a CVS patch mailing list is something else, though...
> >=20
> > Troy, if your CTO ends up allowing you guys to set it up, I'll be able
> to
> > send you a CVS tree (.tgz format) with a few of the patches in mailing
> list
> > archives already applied.
> >=20
> > Scott.
> >=20
> > * Troy (Office PC) translated into ASCII [Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at
> 05:46:30PM -0700][<address@hidden>]
> > > Let me talk to our CTO about setting up something. =20
> > >=20
> > > Troy Melquist Founder
> > > REDCELLX SOFTWARE
> > > www.redcellx.com
> > > 408 SW 2nd ave
> > > suite 412
> > > Portland Oregon 97204 USA
> > > 503 295 9680
> > >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
> Leon
> > > Woestenberg
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:40 PM
> > > To: address@hidden
> > > Subject: Re: [lwip] LWIP Patches and CVS [contact with Adam]
> > >=20
> > > Hello all,
> > >=20
> > > a few weeks ago I have had contact with Adam about setting up a
> public
> > > CVS
> > > on http://savanah.nongnu.org (note the nongnu) or
> > > http://www.sourceforge.net/
> > >=20
> > > Adam was enthousiastic about it, as he was currently involved in a
> new
> > > project
> > > at SICS. (Winternet", http://winternet.sics.se/). I can quote his
> > > response
> > > tomorrow
> > > when I am at my work place again.
> > >=20
> > > Both Savannah and Sourceforge acceptation teams rejected lwIP
> because of
> > > the
> > > "original BSD" license.
> > >=20
> > > After this, I have asked Adam if it was possible to blend to the
> > > "official
> > > modified BSD"
> > > license, but I have had no response on this. (This was 1 or 2 weeks
> > > ago).
> > > Probably,
> > > such things have to go through SICS lawyers "layer" anyway.
> > >=20
> > > (In short, the original BSD license was modified by the director of
> > > Berkeley
> > > University
> > > as statement #3 was ambigious in the sense of "contributors").
> > >=20
> > > So, either the license be modified according to this, or someone
> should
> > > set
> > > up a CVS
> > > server on their _own server_ so that we can proceed with the current
> > > license
> > > without
> > > legal trouble.
> > >=20
> > > Can someone do this? It might be the most viable option.
> > >=20
> > > Regards,
> > >=20
> > > Leon Woestenberg.
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > > >
> > > > > If not, I am thinking about setting up a temporary public CVS
> which
> > > people
> > > > > can submit patches for/commit to... (Paul is one person who
> seems to
> > > know
> > > > > his stuff)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using lwIP in my main project right now, and until the
> project
> > > is
> > > > > converted over to SF.net, it would be nice to know that there is
> at
> > > least
> > > > > one comprehensive source for updated/reduced bug code.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > > i don't know if it is a good idea for my patches to go in
> directly,
> > > > since i don't use lwip via the lwip api, but from the low level
> api.
> > > > my patches are untested in this respect, so they should go through
> > > > someone who is using lwip standalone, and using lwip with threads
> etc.
> > > >
> > > > i am quite prepared to help maintain lwip if api/*.c stuff is
> > > > dropped, or at least someone can verify that it still works
> > > > after i apply patches
> > > >
> > > > perhaps go ahead and get the cvs up and cc the announcement to
> > > > adam. if he is not responding to mail, perhaps someone in europe
> > > > could just phone him to let him know we are stealing his
> > > > project  :-)
> > > >
> > > > in any case he will always have cvs write access of course
> > > >
> > > > -paul
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
> > > >
> > >=20
> > > [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
> > >=20
> > > [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
> >=20
> > --=20
> > http://quadhome.com/           - Personal webpage
> > tranzoa.net                    - Firewall
> >=20
> > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> > Version: 3.12
> > GAT dpu s: a--- C++ UL+++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N++ o+ K++ w++=20
> > O M V(-) PS+ PE Y+ PGP+++ t@ 5 X- R- tv(-) b++++ DI++++ D+=20
> > G e* h! r* y=20
> > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> >=20
> [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
>=20
> [This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]

--=20
http://quadhome.com/           - Personal webpage
tranzoa.net                    - Firewall

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GAT dpu s: a--- C++ UL+++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N++ o+ K++ w++=20
O M V(-) PS+ PE Y+ PGP+++ t@ 5 X- R- tv(-) b++++ DI++++ D+=20
G e* h! r* y=20
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAj2vI1sACgkQ+1+mlYgeODdw1QCfaCKYK+2SV2q9Vi/TDxtjC6T+
tmsAnAgZEjzzfMWRdVdJEnw2pnyGs+ZU
=NuzB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]