[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW
|
From: |
Jani Monoses |
|
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:29:30 +0200 |
> 2. It seems like the sockets API code that uses SOCK_RAW should be
> dependent on the same LWIP_RAW definition, right?
Yes. Although in sockets there is no dependence on LWIP_TCP or LWIP_UDP
either. Possibly other parts in src/api need some more ifdefs
Jani
- [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW,
Jani Monoses <=
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Ed Sutter, 2004/02/23
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, christiaan . simons, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kieran Mansley, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Peter Graf, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, lukem . lwip, 2004/02/24
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Larry Piggins, 2004/02/25
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Kaos, 2004/02/25
- Re: [lwip-users] SOCK_RAW, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/02/26