[Arkadiusz Miskiewicz] use /proc/meminfo instead of /proc/kcore (correct version of the patch)

[Jan-Henrik Haukeland]

What do you think Christian?

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> use /proc/meminfo instead of /proc/kcore (correct version of the	patch)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 8 Sep 2003 20:03:55 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> KMail/1.5.3
>
>
>
>
> diff -urN monit-4.0.org/process/sysdep_LINUX.c 
> monit-4.0/process/sysdep_LINUX.c
> --- monit-4.0.org/process/sysdep_LINUX.c        2003-09-08 19:20:44.000000000 
> +0200
> +++ monit-4.0/process/sysdep_LINUX.c    2003-09-08 19:26:46.000000000 +0200
> @@ -84,24 +84,38 @@
>   *  @file
>   */
>  
> -#define PAGE_TO_KBYTE_SHIFT PAGE_SHIFT-10
> +#define        PAGE_TO_KBYTE_SHIFT PAGE_SHIFT-10
> +#define FREEMEM         "MemFree:"
> +#define FREESWAP        "SwapFree:"
>  
>  int init_process_info_sysdep(void) {
>  
> -  struct stat buf;
> -  
> +  int memfd;
> +  char buf[1024], *ptr1, *ptr2;
>  
> -  /* I hope this is okay hack to get the total memsize. (-: */
> +  if ((memfd = open("/proc/meminfo", O_RDONLY)) == -1) {
> +      return FALSE;
> +  }
>  
> -  if ( stat("/proc/kcore", &buf) != 0 ) {
> +  /* read the file */
> +  if (read(memfd, buf, sizeof(buf)) < 0) {
> +      close(memfd);
> +      return FALSE;
> +  }
>  
> -    return FALSE;
> +  close(memfd);
> +  
> +  ptr1 = strstr(buf, FREEMEM);
> +  ptr2 = strstr(buf, FREESWAP);
>  
> +  if (!ptr1 || !ptr2) {
> +      return FALSE;
>    }
>  
> -  num_cpus= sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF);
> +  /* we only care about integer values */
> +  mem_kbyte_max = atoi(ptr1+strlen(FREEMEM)) /* + atoi(ptr2+strlen(FREESWAP)) 
> */ ;
>  
> -  mem_kbyte_max = buf.st_size>>10;
> +  num_cpus= sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF);
>  
>    return TRUE;
>  
>
> -- 
> Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, Grupa BeeProvider - http://www.beep.pl/
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---

-- 
Jan-Henrik Haukeland