[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:35:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Only if you avoid using letters and digits that look like each other.
> No 'O' 'o' 'l', for example.
Well, that would certainly help. I remain a bit sceptical that a 27
arbitrary character sequence composed of upper and lower letters and
digits (excluding a few) would actually be more readable (in any
useful way) than a 40 digit sequence of hex digits.
It would be shorter, and I can see that being an advantage. As
Nathaniel suggests, truncating the hash might be good enough?
Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Thomas Haas, 2005/09/06
Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Hendrik Boom, 2005/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Thomas Haas, 2005/09/07
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs,
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Andy Jones, 2005/09/07
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Bruce Stephens, 2005/09/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/09/08
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Bruce Stephens, 2005/09/08
Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Hendrik Boom, 2005/09/07
[Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Lapo Luchini, 2005/09/09