Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs

[Andy Jones]

Using hash values was the right thing to do.

But it would be nice if they were displayed in a more human-readable way.

On 08/09/05, Lapo Luchini <address@hidden> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> What makes me chuckle with an evil grin in this discussion is that
> probably the use of hash values in monotone was one of the main features
> that convinced me it was more "worth trying" then the other distributed
> ones ;-)
> 
> (another very important one was the use of SQLite, which is brililant)
> 
> - --
> L a p o   L u c h i n i
> l a p o @ l a p o . i t
> w w w . l a p o . i t /
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkMgv5QACgkQaJiCLMjyUvsMSQCeLS4bPWqe+hTZvvUaNVLpg3N+
> IAgAoMSRjm2s9VRfrAfw9NV1Ywkva9zn
> =WiFf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Monotone-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
>