[Monotone-devel] Re: closed branches

[Bruce Stephens]

Daniel Carosone <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

>  4a) has a special 'branch completed' cert on the child (propagate)
>     node (or on the head? I think i prefer it on the "merge back"
>     result as a better conceptual model).

I think it's easier if this special cert is always on what would
otherwise be the head, even if that's not perfect.

>  4b) has a special 'branch abandoned' cert on the head, for branches
>     that are development dead ends?

That seems useful.  In particular, the same thing might offer a way to
kill a head that you no longer want in a live branch.

[...]