[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Uhmmm, why do we need more than one way?
From: |
Thomas Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Uhmmm, why do we need more than one way? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:48:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I only considered this important off Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker's post:
> A small note: that statement was incorrect. The correct one is like
> this:
>
> (cd po; make monotone.pot-update && make ${lang}.mo ${lang}.gmo)
I tried to run this, but got the following error:
address@hidden net.venge.monotone]$ export lang=de
address@hidden net.venge.monotone]$ (cd po; make monotone.pot-update &&
make ${lang}.mo ${lang}.gmo)
make: *** No rule to make target `monotone.pot-update'. Stop.
Sorry to bug you with this, but am I missing something?
Tommy.
- --
Registered Linux User #369861
PGP Public Key on http://thomaskeller.biz/pgp/thomas-keller.pkr
Learn to quote http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEPVmB9IAC2cFt/voRAiXpAKCcVwwxfZoIlLCK4PVZcrEOdrBuKACfexK5
aqycdJLJLKRmNkstjtiNp8A=
=iv6C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----