Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: results of mercurial user survey

[Zbynek Winkler]

Nathaniel Smith wrote:

> As it happens, the actual checking proper seems to be almost invisible
> in profiles of 0.26's pulls.  There's still some reason to think that
> this is all doable.  So, that's why I think we should keep trying the
> "improve speed while refusing to give up safety" strategy for now...
>  
I do not know the code as much, but IIRC monotone still stores 
reverse-deltas but sends forward-deltas over netsync? Or is this only 
issue with the dumb/plain interface? When doing fresh pull this could be 
a significant overhead...

Zbynek

--
http://zw.matfyz.cz/     http://robotika.cz/
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic