Re: [Monotone-devel] Subversion Update Command Considered Harmful

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

In message <address@hidden> on Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:13:48 +0100, Bruce Stephens 
<address@hidden> said:

monotone> 
<http://willowbend.cx/2006/06/19/subversion-update-command-considered-harmful/>
monotone> 
monotone> I'm not quite sure what it's saying, except that review is
monotone> important, and that CVS and subversion don't make it so
monotone> easy.  I'm not sure why he argues that that makes git
monotone> better.

To me, it connects with what is suggest in the monotone manual,
commit-then-update-and-maybe-merge.

Other than that, I think the classic thing, to have the diffs of each
new change sent to a mailing list works well for review.

monotone> But anyway, it's another vote for the importance of workflow
monotone> support, I suppose.

Agreed.

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         address@hidden
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis