Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

[Markus Schiltknecht]

Hi,

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <address@hidden> on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:38:26 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht 
> <address@hidden> said:
>
> markus> > So far, I'm getting the sense that there are a lot of
> markus> > opinions on what replacement system to use, a bit carelessly
> markus> > before having answered the above questions thoroughly.
> markus> 
> markus> How did you get that impression?
>
> You said it yourself: Most PostgreSQL developers currently want to
> stay with CVS.

Uh, yah. But I was refering to the "lots of opinions on what replacement 
system to use". This has not much to do with the want or need (for lack 
of a better alternative) to stay with CVS, IMO.

> Unless there's a majority that wants to move on, I doubt there will be
> a move.  In the end, it has to be a group effort, or it will simply
> not happen.

I absolutely agree. And I'm quite sure most PostgreSQL developers also 
know that, thus I don't see much point in warning them - they are 
resistant enough ;-)

As you might have noticed, I myself don't consider monotone ready for 
use by the PostgreSQL project, yet. And I've never advocated for 
switching *now*. I only made Tom's point...

Regards

Markus