|
| From: | Zbynek Winkler |
| Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] Command design and naming? |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:48:53 +0100 |
On 2/23/07, Thomas Moschny <address@hidden> wrote:
On Friday 23 February 2007, William Uther wrote: > C: For update: mtn pull branch && mtn merge && mtn update But you are of course right with your observation that one often has to type 'mtn pull && mtn update'. So what about having a --pull switch for update that uses the default arguments of the last pull?
hg goes the other way. It has -u (--update) argument for pull. I rarely use it but I think it is better to have -u for pull than -p for update. I also believe that UI convergence is a good thing :-) Zbynek
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |