[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:47:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> On 06/11/2007, at 0:18, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> > Fedora already has a working monotone package
> > ...
> Well, there isn't for ppc.
There will be (again), see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=259161.
If it doesn't show up, you should ping on that bug.
> But that did not answer my question. Is the fix correct or not? I
> think the spec file should work on different systems, and we can make
> it to work even if openSUSE and Fedora have different requirements.
Why did you change the pattern for the info files in the %files section?
Nevertheless, the spec works here on f7.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Moschny <address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora, Julio M . Merino Vidal, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora, Thomas Moschny, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora, Matt Johnston, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora, Thomas Moschny, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora, Thomas Keller, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] RPM build broken in Fedora,
Thomas Moschny <=