Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone

[Thomas Moschny]

Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> So in your world, there still are:
>
>    - 'commit' (branchname => value,  changelog => comment)
>    - 'tag'    (possibly with a comment)
>    - 'test-result'  (possibly with a comment)
>
> Right? Hm... so every cert would have a value, a date, a signer and
> possibly a comment.

Hmm, it's more like this:

name = 'commit',      value = (author, date, comment=changelog, branch)
name = 'tag',         value = (author, date, comment, tag)
name = 'suspend',     value = (author, date, comment, branch)
name = 'test-result', value = (author, date, comment?, value)

Ideally 'branch' and 'tag' (as well as the 'signer') should ideally not be 
plain names but somehow reference branches, tags and keys, respectively, so 
that renaming becomes possible.

-- 
Thomas Moschny  <address@hidden>

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.