[Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone

[Bruce Stephens]

Thomas Moschny <address@hidden> writes:

> On Monday 28 January 2008, Graydon Hoare wrote:

[...]

>> The changes are, primarily: [...]
>>    - a sketch of the long-planned upgrade to certificates
>
> Can you explain that a bit? Is this related to the idea of creating
> combined certs consisting of a author/date/msg/branch tuple?

Probably.  IIRC it's also been suggested that certs should have a
version number.  Obvious other things to fix are references to key
and/or branch names.  (And presumably tag names, if one wants to be
able to rename tags.)  Wasn't there also talk about having all certs
contain an author field?