[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone
From: |
Markus Schiltknecht |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:04:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080109) |
Hi All,
Thomas Keller wrote:
So where lacks monotone the most?
While this list of *lacking* features is very appreciated, I feel it's
also important to point out where monotone is shining.
What comes to my mind:
- very strong integrity checking
- compiled C++ code, not interpreted
- pretty thought-through and flexible certification concept (IMO)
- database backend (SQL compliance)
- dedicated multi-branch netsync protocol
- ease of extensibility by lua hooks
I'm sure there's much more...
Regards
Markus
[Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Graydon Hoare, 2008/01/29
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2008/01/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone,
Markus Schiltknecht <=
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, hendrik, 2008/01/29
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Ludovic Brenta, 2008/01/29
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Ethan Blanton, 2008/01/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Jack Lloyd, 2008/01/28