[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone
From: |
Kelly F. Hickel |
Subject: |
RE: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:51:39 -0600 |
> One reason for separating out the author from the signer is that, in
> the
> event of a database rebuild, all certs will be re-signed by whoever
> does
> the rebuild and the original author is lost. This has happened a few
> times in the monotone history and while not a huge problem does leave
> rebuild a little more lossy than it could be.
>
> Cheers,
> Derek
>
Hmm, doesn't that suggest that *every* cert needs an "original signer"
in addition to the signer?
-Kelly
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Derek Scherger, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Nathaniel Smith, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/29
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2008/01/29
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Nathaniel Smith, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/29
- RE: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone,
Kelly F. Hickel <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/29
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Graydon Hoare, 2008/01/29
[Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Graydon Hoare, 2008/01/29
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2008/01/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28