[Monotone-devel] No, not *directly* modified by a recent mtn.

[hendrik]

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0400, address@hidden wrote:
> Actually, even worse version skew is a real possibility.  A month ago I 
> was running this machine under Debian testing, so it's possible this 
> very data base has been modified by a monotone more recent than 0.40.  I 
> went back top stable because too many applications were having problems.

No, that's not likely to be the problem.

> 
> Ouch.  Maybe I'd better reboot and try committing with testing's more 
> recent version of monotone.

The debian-testing I used turns out still to have monotone 0.40.  
Evidently I haven't updeted it recently.

- hendrik