|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #50561] 350X slower code for eps() written in C++ rather than an m-file |
Date: | Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:45:26 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 |
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #50561 (project octave): It would probably also be slightly faster to use double *pepsval = epsval.data(); and then pepsval[i] instead of using expsval(i) for indexing in the assignment inside the loop. Or to use epsval.xelem(i). Either of those avoids the check on the reference count. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50561> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |