[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail
From: |
Carlo de Falco |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:48:36 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0 |
Follow-up Comment #21, bug #53258 (project octave):
Rik, I agree that it is inefficient to keep working on the old version of the
code.
So, is it OK if I merge Cristiano's branch into default now
and we keep working there?
You can see the complete set of changes here:
https://bitbucket.org/cdf1/octave/branch/dorigo#diff
These are all the files touched:
doc/interpreter/linalg.txi
scripts/sparse/bicg.m
scripts/sparse/bicgstab.m
scripts/sparse/cgs.m
scripts/sparse/gmres.m
scripts/sparse/ilu.m
scripts/sparse/module.mk
scripts/sparse/pcg.m
scripts/sparse/private/__alltohandles__.m
scripts/sparse/private/__default__input__.m
scripts/sparse/tfqmr.m
it doesn't really look too invasive, I think
we can review and finalize the changes in a
codesprint next week.
notice that this will override your changes to test
from changeset 96c74e33d17a but I think it's easier
to re-apply them manually also considering that similar
changes may also be needed for the 12 new BIST in pcg
and for the BIST in other solvers.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53258>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, (continued)
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Carlo de Falco, 2018/03/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Rik, 2018/03/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Carlo de Falco, 2018/03/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Carlo de Falco, 2018/03/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Rik, 2018/03/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Carlo de Falco, 2018/03/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Carlo de Falco, 2018/03/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Marco Caliari, 2018/03/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Marco Caliari, 2018/03/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Rik, 2018/03/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail,
Carlo de Falco <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Rik, 2018/03/10
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail, Carlo de Falco, 2018/03/10