[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60237] Differente behaviour in anonymous function handling

[anonymous]

Follow-up Comment #17, bug #60237 (project octave):

Oh sorry and Thanks! I wrongly read the test case as the following that should
produce error:


function r = bug_60237 ()

  r = ancall (2) + 1;

endfunction


function r = ancall (a)

  d = 2;

  function c = bm (a)

    c = a + d;

  endfunction;

  r = @() bm (a);

endfunction


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60237>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/