[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60237] Differente behaviour in anonymous function handling

[anonymous]

Follow-up Comment #23, bug #60237 (project octave):

Interesting! My opinion was that when f() is called 'd' is out of scope.
Possibly this should produce [2 3] :


function r = bug_60237 ()

  f = ancall (2);

  r = [f(), f()];

end


function r = ancall (a)

  d = 2;

  function c = bm (a)

    c = d;

    d = d+1;

  end

  r = @() bm (a);

end



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60237>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/