[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60237] Differente behaviour in anonymous function handling

[Markus Mützel]

Follow-up Comment #20, bug #60237 (project octave):

That is a syntax extension that doesn't work in Matlab. I used the following
test case instead:

function r = bug_60237 ()

f = ancall (2);

r = f() + 1;

end


function r = ancall (a)

d = 2;

function c = bm (a)

c = a + d;

end

r = @() bm (a);

end


Results in Matlab R2021a:

>> bug_60237

ans =

     5


Same result with a current tip.

Again: "bm" is a nested function and shares its scope with the containing
function.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60237>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/