[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61788] arrays of type int16 contain wrong numbers

[Arun Giridhar]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #61788 (project octave):

I did some benchmarking in standalone C++ with the two variants (base + i *
increment) and (preceding value + increment). The serial version is slower but
by such a tiny amount that it is viable. Over 1e9 iterations, the first loop
took 0.14 seconds and the second took 0.28 seconds, which might look like
half-speed but it's only 0.14 nanoseconds per iteration, so even for a range
with say 1e7 elements, it slows down only by 1.4 milliseconds.

@jwe: does the change have to be done only in Range.h and Range.cc or are
there other locations too?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61788>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/