[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #66882] Convolution code path improvements

[Markus Mützel]

Follow-up Comment #59, bug #66882 (group octave):

Looking at that part of the code for longer, I'm not sure if it does "the
right thing"™.

If I understand correctly, the step size (incx) is already taken into account
when converting from `c` to `cx`. But the `?axpy` functions are still called
with an increment of `incx` instead of an increment of `1`.

Are there any tests that check if these "mixed" real/complex overloads are
working correctly?



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66882>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature