Re: octave - vtk

[Levente Torok]

>From the sorces, I see that octaviz was made to communicate with the
interface objects.
I dont see it to be a great importance however a function for
exporting objects  ( 3D points and 3D vector field ) is worth having,
however I dont think it deserves a separate package. So I have no idea
what the best would be with it.


On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Martin Helm <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, 08:41:40 schrieb John W. Eaton:
>> On  3-Nov-2010, Levente Torok wrote:
>> | Is there any particular reason why vtk binding ( octaviz ) have
>> | died?
>>
>> Lack of volunteers to maintain the package?
>>
>> | I think it is worth having simple functions that support saving in vtk
>> | file format and can fire the vtk, if it exists on the path.
>>
>> I'm not sure that bindinds for vtk functions belong in the core Octave
>> distribution, but I don't see any reason to not have them in an
>> external package if someone wants to maintain it.
>>
>> jwe
>
> From the octaviz news page:
> http://octaviz.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=news
>
> 02. 01. 2010 - Octaviz is an abandoned project. If there is interest in
> reviving Octaviz, use the sourceforge site to contact the previously listed
> project admin(s).
>
> Earlier it was asked for volunteers helping to migrate it to newer vtk
> versions.
>