[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave - vtk
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: octave - vtk |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:34:41 -0600 |
2010/11/4 Judd Storrs <address@hidden>:
> Maybe rather than write our own lexers and parsers another approach
> would be to get CableSWIG to work with octave.
This sounds like a partial rewrite of Octaviz? What Octaviz does is
wrap VTK for Octave and then provides a few m-files using that
wrapping. It already has lexers and parsers written, presumably in an
old style for wrapping VTK. Are you describing a newer way to wrap
VTK? I generally distrust starting from scratch than patching old
code. The latter is almost always a better strategy for success.
Frankly, I'm not sure this is valuable at all. While VTK is a nice
visualisation system, my main interest in Octaviz at the time was that
gnuplot produces ugly and slow 3d graphics. Now that the fltk backend
is fairly mature, I don't have this complaint. I think I'd rather look
into implementing the Matlab lighting command than keep working with
Octaviz.
- Jordi G. H.
Re: octave - vtk, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/11/03
Re: octave - vtk, Judd Storrs, 2010/11/04
- Re: octave - vtk,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: octave - vtk, Judd Storrs, 2010/11/04