[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: License question
|
From: |
GoSim |
|
Subject: |
Re: License question |
|
Date: |
Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:08:43 -0500 (CDT) |
I don't understand what you mean with "Getting major contributors onboard
to a commercial opportunity later might sounds like it could be
complicated but probably isn't too hard in practice."
Do you mean for services? If it is released as pure GPL from my
understanding you can't ever commercialize it.
Anyway, you are right about the other things you wrote. But I think it is
the most fair to me that created the software. I will promise that their
code will always be GPL. For the open source people there will be a block
diagram environment completely free and open source and if I want to I can
add some industrial sensor features and charge money for it. Simulink is
actually more expensive than Matlab which is kind of surprising but probably
reflects the demand.
--
Sent from: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-Maintainers-f1638794.html
- License question, GoSim, 2019/04/02
- Re: License question, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2019/04/02
- Re: License question, Mike Miller, 2019/04/03
- Re: License question, Nicholas Jankowski, 2019/04/03
- Re: License question, GoSim, 2019/04/03
- Re: License question, Colin Macdonald, 2019/04/03
- Re: License question,
GoSim <=
- Re: License question, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2019/04/09
- Re: License question, GoSim, 2019/04/10
- Re: License question, Doug Stewart, 2019/04/10
- Re: License question, GoSim, 2019/04/10
- Re: License question, Doug Stewart, 2019/04/10
- Re: License question, GoSim, 2019/04/10
- Re: License question, Nicholas Jankowski, 2019/04/10
- Re: License question, GoSim, 2019/04/10
- GoSim initial test [was Re: License question], W. Robert J. Funnell, Prof., 2019/04/10
- Re: GoSim initial test [was Re: License question], GoSim, 2019/04/10