[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Worth to mention in Octave 6 NEWS, support for private in namespaces?
From: |
José Abílio Matos |
Subject: |
Worth to mention in Octave 6 NEWS, support for private in namespaces? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2020 19:12:23 +0100 |
Hi,
this is something that I notice when working with Octave 5 and
Octave 6. As I said in another message I am using a namespace:
+dir1/+dir2
+dir1/file1.m
+dir1/private/file2.m
The path has the location where +dir1 is but not +dir1.
The difference between Octave 5 and 6 is that file1 "knows" file2 in Octave 6
but not in Octave 5.
I suppose that it means that Octave 6 supports private in namespaces but
Octave 5. If that it is the case then I think that it would be worth to refer
this in NEWS.
What do you think?
Best regards,
--
José Matos
- Worth to mention in Octave 6 NEWS, support for private in namespaces?,
José Abílio Matos <=