[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Doubt Regarding IR
From: |
Reto Büttner |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Doubt Regarding IR |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:50:38 +0200 |
Hi Tilman and Arun,
I agree with Tilman concerning responsitivity.
Voltage vs angle would also be similar a trigonometric function. The
responsitivity is similar a cosine, the voltage would be similar to a
sine.
Cheers, Reto
2010/8/27 Tilman Baumann <address@hidden>:
> Tilman Baumann wrote:
>
>> If you would plot voltage vs angle you would probably get hysteresis like
>> courve. Not sure about that, but that seems to make sense to me.
>>
>> Not sure if I'm BSing here. But this is how it made sense to me.
>
> Hysteresis is obviously the wrong term as I just realised.
>
> Well, I'm not a matematician. I mean a courve that follows the form or a
> typical hysteresis but obviously without the actual hysteresis effect (not
> following the same courve for both directions).
>
> Sorry for that. If somebody here knows what cource I'm babbling about, I
> would be interested in the actual name of that thing. :)
>
> Tilman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>