Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Subsystems, airframe files.

[Christophe De Wagter]

Dear Mark,

Thanks for all the updates. The splitting of eagletree into the baro and airspeed subsystems sound like very good options as there are several other baro's and airspeed sensors. 

For the bomb part: do you see any option to make it into a module instead (and be able to remove all bomb related stuff from the main_ap.c)? It's not part of the essential fixedwing firmware (sensor-control-nav-actuator) and can be run at the end of the periodic loop (->module).

Christophe

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:10 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:

Just to let you all know that I successfully converted my "fixed wing" airframe files to the new structure.

In order to do this for my particular setup, I had to enhance the SVN as follows:
- create a new subsystem to support bomb.c    <subsystem name="navigation"  type="bomb"/>
- separate the Eagletree airspeed sensor from the altitude sensor (I'm only using the airspeed sensor). To do this, I split the former subsystem into two parts:
        <subsystem name="airspeed"  type="ets"/> and <subsystem name="baro"  type="ets"/>
These modifications were committed to the SVN.

I also updated the Wiki to reflect these changes.

FYI, Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: paparazzi-devel-bounces+mark.griffin=itu.int@nongnu.org [mailto:paparazzi-devel-bounces+mark.griffin=itu.int@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Felix Ruess
Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2010 11:13 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Subsystems, airframe files.

Hi Helge,

I meant to follow up on my earlier email.
Just after I wrote the mail we implemented an automatic selection for
the actuators depending on the board (4017 for tiny2 and twog, 4015
for tiny1).
So you don't have to worry about that anymore since it is fixed in
hardware for a board anyway.

We took the definition of the control loops to use out of the general
makefile and made it a "subsystem" because not everyone is using the
standard control.
So to get the standard control loops you have to specify that
subsystem without type as you indicated below.

Cheers, Felix

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Helge Walle <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am rewriting my airframe file, and wonder about the following:
>
> Is the line
>
> <subsystem name="control"/>
>
> a replacement for
>
> <subsystem name="actuators"     type="4017"/>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Helge.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel