Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Reply to: "automated landing (address@hidden)"

[Aka]

Hi Chris,

now I see...
Is this use of "attitude" actually possible? (Question to the others..)
I thought it is just a setting of variables (thats how I think I used it)

Anyway, what plane are you using? With your flare if the plane makes a touch 
before TD it may not reach the point of switching off...

Did you try the "standard" way? I think I just added another check if the plane 
is inside the landing field because with strong headwind one plane made the 
motor shutoff and touchdown too early.

And I used a quite high pitch angle to get a smooth landing. This could be 
another problem of the "climb" method. It will probably land nose down and 
quite fast.

I´m doing landing experiment in other contexts, too, and the last meters are 
definetely the hardest :-)

Marc



-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:28:20 +0300
> Von: Chris <address@hidden>
> An: address@hidden
> Betreff: [Paparazzi-devel] Reply to: "automated landing       
> (address@hidden)"

> Hi Mark and thank you for your help on this.
> Just a question because i am confused, why the throttle is disabled?
> throttle should be on until the plane reaches "TD" which is located in 
> the middle of the runway
> and by then the plane will probably be down
> (The "TD" waypoint is ~150m away from "RNW_END_SOUTH" )
> 
> <block name="flare_north">
> <exception cond="pprz_mode == PPRZ_MODE_MANUAL || pprz_mode ==
> PPRZ_MODE_AUTO1" deroute="standby"/>
> <go approaching_time="0" climb="-1.0" from="RNW_END_SOUTH" hmode="route"
> vmode="climb" wp="TD"/>
> <attitude roll="0.0" throttle="0.0" until="FALSE" vmode="throttle"/>
> </block>
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

-- 
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren!                  
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone