Re: [paragui-dev] Paragui/Ruby!

[Andrew Ford]

That sounds like a good idea to me.  Lets see what
Eric and Alex have to say about it if they are around.

Andrew

--- Leon Torres <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Andrew Ford wrote:
> 
> > Hey, that's cool.  Will any of these changes break
> > backwards compatability if they were included in
> > 1.0.x?
> 
> Most likely not. Before this becomes a concern
> though...
> 
> > Does it break the current Python bindings?
> 
> No. However, it's possible that I'll move all Python
> and Ruby specific
> interface definitions somewhere else, so that they
> can be maintained
> independently of the main Paragui distribution.
> Paragui main should
> concern itself only with language-agnostic swig
> things. I believe this
> might be the best way to accomodate future swig
> bindings to other
> languages.
> 
> > I think we can include this in 1.2 in any case.
> > If nothing gets broken, I think it would be fine
> to
> > include with the main distribution.  As for
> question
> > (1), I don't know, I don't know who was working on
> the
> > Python bindings.
> 
> Tell you what, I'll try to seperate the concerns so
> that the
> language-specific bindinds are in sepearate
> packages. They will
> have their own cvs project and GNU autotools setup.
> This should
> make the package maintainer's job easy (logical RPMs
> and debs)
> and prevent stale language bindings from hampering
> the core
> distribution. Also, different people can maintain
> the various
> binding projects. I certainly don't want to keep the
> Python stuff up to
> date. :p
> 
> Let me know if this would be a good thing.
> 
> - Leon
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> paragui-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
>
http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/paragui-dev


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com