RE: [paragui-dev] Paragui Developer

[Christian M. Jensen]

Can you provide as much detail as possible including compile flags?

Is there a way to phase out libsigc++? BTW, we got it to compile on
Windows but it is not a good long term solution.

The more information you can provide the better.

Christian

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden
On Behalf Of Alexander Pipelka
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 11:08 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: [paragui-dev] Paragui Developer

On Do, 2005-11-17 at 16:04 -0800, Christian M. Jensen wrote:
> The biggest problems we are facing are performance and size of the
> executable. It has a tendency to redraw all the time (many times
> unintelligently). We are also looking to get better font rendering.
Hopefully you used the "devel-1-1" branch. There are *a lot* of
performance
improvements compared to the 1.0 version.
The size of the executable can be massively reduced by disabling runtime
type information and exceptions. Additionally stripping all the unneeded
sections from the lib reduces the size of ParaGUI 1.1.9 (CVS) to ~600
kb.

Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
>
[mailto:address@hidden
> On Behalf Of Ulf Lorenz
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:31 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [paragui-dev] Paragui Developer
> 
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:51:29PM -0800, Christian M. Jensen wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Who is actively developing Paragui?
> As I understand, Alex is the man to seek out with questions. I think
the
> main contributions have recently come from Martin Bickel, who seems to
> be trying to migrate asc to the current paragui version.
> 
> Why do you ask?
> 
> 
> cu,
> Ulf
> 



_______________________________________________
paragui-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paragui-dev