Re: none

[Ingo Ruhnke]

address@hidden writes:

> removed dummy_ptr - this reduces compile time, footprint and
> complexity. There was no point where it was needed and it's even
> been removed from boost.

It never was in boost, it was a self written thing from me, I just
placed it there, since that was the place where all the other pointers
where. The purbos of this class was to add a additional == 0 check on
dereference.

> -      boost::dummy_ptr<Sprite> sur;
> +      Sprite * sur;

I prefer the 'Sprite*' style, 'cause the above looks like a
multiplication to me.

-- 
Advent:     http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/advent/
Feuerkraft: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/feuerkraft/
Pingus:     http://pingus.seul.org/           || ICQ:      59461927
Home:       http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/  || JabberID: address@hidden