pspp-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders


From: bojo42
Subject: Re: Testsuite failures on Ubuntu's autobuilders
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:15:36 +0100

John's fix works:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/97611171/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.pspp_0.7.9%2Bgit20120319-0ubuntu1~bojo1~precise1_BUILDING.txt.gz

Thanks.

Am Sonntag, den 18.03.2012, 14:29 -0700 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
> I haven't done anything to address that one yet, and I don't
> think that John has either.
> 
> bojo42 <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I let it rebuild for precise with current Git and while the 180 & 181
> > are fixed just fine, there still is an error with the 439 test:
> >
> > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/97273119/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.pspp_0.7.9%2Bgit20120318-0ubuntu1~bojo1~precise1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
> >  
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2012, 22:15 -0700 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
> >> Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
> >> 
> >> > John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> 180 and 181 both relate to reading of openoffice.org
> >> >> spreadsheet files and seem to be just warnings.  I wonder why
> >> >> the problem didn't show up on debian?  Maybe a different libxml
> >> >> library?  Since this xml is generated by openoffice itself,
> >> >> there's probably not much we can do if libxml thinks it is
> >> >> wrong.  Perhaps we should just change the test to ignore the
> >> >> warning.
> >> >
> >> > Looking through my own builder's logs, I see at least three
> >> > failures of these tests on different days (Feb. 29 and March 2
> >> > and 3):
> >> >
> >> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120229030501/testsuite.dir/
> >> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120302030501/testsuite.dir/
> >> > http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master/20120303030503/testsuite.dir/
> >> >
> >> > Must be something nondeterministic at work.
> >> 
> >> I found it with valgrind and fixed it with this commit:
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]