[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: failure in documentation branch
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: failure in documentation branch |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:27:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 01:37:47PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:32:39PM +0100, Harry Thijssen wrote:
> You are aware that the tarball build for the documentation branch has
> a failure?
I haven't been monitoring it.
John, it looks like this has been failing the same way from the start,
e.g. see http://benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-documentation/20121230033441/:
../doc//gui.texi:45: warning: @image file `Images/pic1.txt' unreadable:
No such file or directory.
../doc//gui.texi:73: warning: @image file `Images/pic2.txt' unreadable:
No such file or directory.
../doc//gui.texi:89: warning: @image file `Images/pic3.txt' unreadable:
No such file or directory.
and more like that.
The missing .txt files are just warnings. The real problem comes further
down where the .eps files are missing. The eps files are just converted
copies of the .png files.
Here is where we need to make a decision. Do we:
1. Check the .eps files into git.
2. Generate them in Smake and distribute them in the tarball.
3. Generate them in Makefile and expect the user to have the necessary
tools.
??
I see problems with all three options, but I think that 2. is probably the
best compromise at least in the short term.
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://keys.gnupg.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: failure in documentation branch,
John Darrington <=