[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shared disk (DOS)
From: |
Tomas By |
Subject: |
Re: shared disk (DOS) |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:18:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/26 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:16:21 +0200,Peter Maydell wrote:
> No, that doesn't work. [...]
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:17:08 +0200, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In theory if the different guests all access entirely disjoint
> sections of the file this could be made to work. [...]
They can access the exact same data also, it would just mean some
delay for one or more of them, and maybe some arbitrary decision about
the sequence.
(But if they use SHARE.EXE on the DOS side, as I understand it to
work, then there will not be concurrent access to the same DOS
files. And then it's a question of the mapping from those to image
file locations.)
/Tomas
- Re: shared disk (DOS), (continued)
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Peter Maydell, 2021/04/10
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/10
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Peter Maydell, 2021/04/10
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/10
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Jakob Bohm, 2021/04/11
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/11
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/11
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Peter Maydell, 2021/04/12
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/12
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Peter Maydell, 2021/04/12
- Re: shared disk (DOS),
Tomas By <=
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Jakob Bohm, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Dennis Luehring, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Dennis Luehring, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Lars Noodén, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Tomas By, 2021/04/13
- Re: shared disk (DOS), Jakob Bohm, 2021/04/13