[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 2/2] ppc/pnv: Fix pervasive topology calculation for P10
From: |
Caleb Schlossin |
Subject: |
[PATCH 2/2] ppc/pnv: Fix pervasive topology calculation for P10 |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:48:44 -0600 |
Pervasive topology(PIR) calculation for core, thread ID was
wrong for big cores (SMT8). Fixing for P10.
Based on: <20240123195005.8965-1-calebs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Caleb Schlossin <calebs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
hw/ppc/pnv.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
index 2f53883916..aa5aba60b4 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
@@ -1068,12 +1068,23 @@ static uint32_t pnv_chip_pir_p9(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t
core_id,
}
}
+/*
+ * 0:48 Reserved - Read as zeroes
+ * 49:52 Node ID
+ * 53:55 Chip ID
+ * 56 Reserved - Read as zero
+ * 57:59 Quad ID
+ * 60 Core Chiplet Pair ID
+ * 61:63 Thread/Core Chiplet ID t0-t2
+ *
+ * We only care about the lower bits. uint32_t is fine for the moment.
+ */
static uint32_t pnv_chip_pir_p10(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id,
uint32_t thread_id)
{
if (chip->nr_threads == 8) {
- return (chip->chip_id << 8) | ((thread_id & 1) << 2) | (core_id << 3) |
- (thread_id >> 1);
+ return (chip->chip_id << 8) | ((core_id / 4) << 4) |
+ ((core_id % 2) << 3) | thread_id;
} else {
return (chip->chip_id << 8) | (core_id << 2) | thread_id;
}
--
2.31.8
- [PATCH 2/2] ppc/pnv: Fix pervasive topology calculation for P10,
Caleb Schlossin <=