qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ppc/pnv: Fix pervasive topology calculation for P10


From: Caleb Schlossin
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ppc/pnv: Fix pervasive topology calculation for P10
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:44:45 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Cedric,

I'll resend both patches, so this new patch shows up properly as [PATCH 2/2].

Thanks,
Caleb

On 2/27/24 10:15 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Hello Caleb,
> 
> On 2/27/24 15:48, Caleb Schlossin wrote:
>> Pervasive topology(PIR) calculation for core, thread ID was
>> wrong for big cores (SMT8). Fixing for P10.
>>
>> Based on: <20240123195005.8965-1-calebs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Caleb Schlossin <calebs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Since the initial patch [1] is not merged yet, you can simply send a v2
> with the update. There is still some time before soft freeze [2].
> 
> The Subject of this patch [PATCH 2/2] seems to refer to a series. Is
> there a patch 1/2 ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> C.
> 
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240123195005.8965-1-calebs@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
> [2] https://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/9.0
> 
>> ---
>>   hw/ppc/pnv.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> index 2f53883916..aa5aba60b4 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> @@ -1068,12 +1068,23 @@ static uint32_t pnv_chip_pir_p9(PnvChip *chip, 
>> uint32_t core_id,
>>       }
>>   }
>>   +/*
>> + *    0:48  Reserved - Read as zeroes
>> + *   49:52  Node ID
>> + *   53:55  Chip ID
>> + *   56     Reserved - Read as zero
>> + *   57:59  Quad ID
>> + *   60     Core Chiplet Pair ID
>> + *   61:63  Thread/Core Chiplet ID t0-t2
>> + *
>> + * We only care about the lower bits. uint32_t is fine for the moment.
>> + */
>>   static uint32_t pnv_chip_pir_p10(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id,
>>                                    uint32_t thread_id)
>>   {
>>       if (chip->nr_threads == 8) {
>> -        return (chip->chip_id << 8) | ((thread_id & 1) << 2) | (core_id << 
>> 3) |
>> -               (thread_id >> 1);
>> +        return (chip->chip_id << 8) | ((core_id / 4) << 4) |
>> +               ((core_id % 2) << 3) | thread_id;
>>       } else {
>>           return (chip->chip_id << 8) | (core_id << 2) | thread_id;
>>       }
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]