Re: [PATCH v7 02/10] target/ppc: Readability improvements in exception handlers

[Nicholas Piggin]

On Wed Feb 28, 2024 at 6:24 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 15:10, BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Improve readability by shortening some long comments, removing
> >>> comments that state the obvious and dropping some empty lines so they
> >>> don't distract when reading the code.
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
> >>> Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> -    /*
> >>> -     * new interrupt handler msr preserves existing ME unless
> >>> -     * explicitly overridden.
> >>> -     */
> >>> +    /* new interrupt handler msr preserves ME unless explicitly 
> >>> overriden 
> >>> */
> >> 
> >> Minor typo introduced here: should be "overridden".
> >>
> >>>      new_msr = env->msr & (((target_ulong)1 << MSR_ME));
> >> 
> >>> @@ -575,16 +558,10 @@ static void powerpc_excp_6xx(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int 
> >>> excp)
> >>>      /* new srr1 value excluding must-be-zero bits */
> >>>      msr = env->msr & ~0x783f0000ULL;
> >>> 
> >>> -    /*
> >>> -     * new interrupt handler msr preserves existing ME unless
> >>> -     * explicitly overridden
> >>> -     */
> >>> +    /* new interrupt handler msr preserves ME unless explicitly 
> >>> overriden 
> >>> */
> >> 
> >> Ditto, and similarly for other instances later in the patch.
> >
> > Huh, sorry, don't know how I've lost that letter. It also seems that the 
> > last 
> > patch gone missing from the series somehow so if it does not turn up, I can 
> > resend it with these fixed.
>
> As the last patch did not turn up I've resent just that to complete this 
> v7 series. Do I need to send v8 or if these typos are the only change 
> needed maybe they could be fixed up during merge.

I should be okay to do it.

Thanks,
Nick