[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] Re: Bug#307779: ratpoison: add Xsession entry (to be started fr
From: |
Shawn Betts |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] Re: Bug#307779: ratpoison: add Xsession entry (to be started from GDM, for example) |
Date: |
Sun, 29 May 2005 17:01:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) |
Jonathan Walther <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:03:57PM +0200, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
>>An issue that has troubled me for a while now is the debian/ directory
>>in upstream cvs. Couldn't that one be either removed, or preferably
>>kept up to date with the official debian/ directory? Several solutions
>>for implementing that are possible, delegating responsibility and
>>giving commit access to krooger is one - setting up a script that
>>automatically commits and debchanges released versions into upstream
>>cvs is another. I could volunteer to write that script if it were to
>>put into live action.
>
> I believe the upstream debian/ directory is stripped out of source
> tarballs. I don't remember what I did when it came to upgrading to
> 1.3.0. It wasn't a problem though. It just isn't helpful. :-)
Yeah, there's no reason to have them in the source tarballs. It's only
in CVS.
> Sean did give me CVS commit access on sourceforge. I haven't reenabled
> my Savannah account for over a year; it should still exist though.
Send me your savannah username and i'll give you CVS commit
access. Keep your commits to the debian/ directory, of course :).
> For better or worse, it looks like 1.3.0 is what will go into sarge.
> Are there any bugfixes or updates in CVS that need to make it in that
> aren't in Debian right now?
the last 1.4 beta is pretty stable (I think). And I think its basically the same
as CVS.
-Shawn