Re: You rate savannah.gnu.org at A? AYFKM?

[Adam Faiz]

On 16/02/2022 01:01, Pau Amma <pauamma@gundo.com> wrote:
> I went from https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html
> to https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.html and saw this utter
> BS:
>
> - Follows the Web “Content” Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0)
> standard. (A+3)
>
> - Follows the Web Accessibility Initiative — Accessible Rich Internet
> Applications 1.0 (WAI-ARIA 1.0) standard. (A+4)
>
> Newsflash, you ableist jerks: not following those alone makes anything
> an F, no matter what else they do or not. Did you design your fucking
> self-serving "ethical" standards just so you could brag about it and it
> alone getting an A?

I think you misunderstood how the repo criteria evaluation works. A 
repository is only graded an 'F' if it doesn't meet the 'C' criteria.