[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Lost in the (GNU) Savannah
From: |
mathieu |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Lost in the (GNU) Savannah |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 17:08:39 +0200 |
Le lun 08 avr 2002 à 15h05, Shlomi Fish a écrit :
Refer to:
http://www.advogato.org/person/shlomif/diary.html?start=32
for a rant I made about how Savannah treated the submission of two
projects I tried to make. It contains some facts, my opinion and
some criticism, which I believe is constructive.
Personally, when I talk about other people point of view, I use
quotation and links (to mailing-list for example).
Mainly because my main work is to study writings, I have the strong
conviction that texts avoiding this kind of transparency rules
(quotation, references) is not the better way to be "constructive".
As I've previously said, I speak only for myself.
And I think you should realize that your text doesn't contain « some
facts » but does contain your understanding of some facts.
"This started a relatively good natured argument between me and the
Savannah Hackers. I said
that I was allowed to parody the GPL in my COPYING file,
without them being concerned by
it. They thought it was in the project submission for some
reason. (I'm not responsible for
them actually opening the package)."
For example, a link to the concerned mail or a quote should permit
anyone to understand that there no "They" but someone in charge of
your submission, Loic, and another one, me, reacting to a mail he
received as member of the list address@hidden, trying to give
you a complement of informations.
So, use of quotes and references would permit anyone to make up his
mind with a neutral understanding of the fact, not with a partial
version of it.
"I invested a lot of time in coding it, but was also a good human
engineer: I answered
E-mails, even very trivial, politely and informatively; I
formed a mailing list, and actively helped
people who reviewed the code, or wished to integrate it
into their projects; and I actively
thought of what the end user would like to find there. I
think Savannah should follow suit,
and actually trust their hackers for a change."
Wasn't Loic's emails polite and informative ? Are you saying that
savannah doesn't give a s... about what "user would like to find there"
?
Hum. You are free to think and write what you want.
Is it being "a good human engineer" ? I dont know.
--
mathieu