savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-hackers] Re: XXX.gnu.org


From: Brian J. Fox
Subject: [Savannah-hackers] Re: XXX.gnu.org
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 07:47:20 -0700

   From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
   Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 03:13:19 -0500

       I still don't know why PROJECT.gnu.org is a good idea, though.

   I think the advantage is that it would provide a much shorter URL
   for each GNU package.  Also, I think sourceforge does this,
   and some developers wished that savannah would do it too.

At sourceforge, you get two pages.  One you build, called address@hidden,
and one that is built dynamically by the system, called
sf.net/projects/foo.

The advantage is that you can track the stuff that is important to
your package which probably isn't in the basic project maintenance
page.  For example, a free DVD player project might have a lot of
political information on their dvd.gnu.org page which wouldn't be
of interest or importance on their www.gnu.org/projects/dvd page.

Brian
-- 
More people use Apache than Word, and it does them more good.
  Kragen Sitaker, Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:32:18 -0800




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]