speechd-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Should we use the emacspeak speech back-end system-wide in Vinux?


From: Jan Buchal
Subject: Should we use the emacspeak speech back-end system-wide in Vinux?
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:51:07 +0200

>>>>> "HS" == Halim Sahin <halim.sahin at t-online.de> writes:

    HS> Hi,
    HS> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:41:36AM +0200, Tomas Cerha wrote:
    >> Hello Bill,
    >> 
    >> Dne 3.10.2010 14:08, Bill Cox napsal(a): > This is basically
    >> what's got me upset with the current state of >
    >> speech-dispatcher. The main speech-dispatcher dev makes
    >> supporting > any non-Orca app a pain.
    >> 
    >> Please, could you describe what you mean by this? Which change in
    >> Speech Dispatcher made the situation worth in this sense? This is
    >> simply not true and proclamations like this make me upset.

    HS> Read the previous thread: Subject: running
    HS> speech-dispatcher-0.7.1 in system mode

    HS> I can't believe that you don't understand what bill wants to say
    HS> in his mail. HTH. halim
Dear Mr. Sahim,

I believe that you are not on right way. Regarding SD and system wide or
user session is so, that both works. The same situation is with PA or
ALSA and INET or UNIX socket. What was changed is that the start SD for
X users witch PA is easier then before. But definitely the "old" way is
still as possible, was not remove the functionality.

What was changed too where some configuration options in default
configuration but it has no relations with SD functionality. The default
configuration process is however on the packages maintainers of each
Linux distribution. So if you are not satisfied with some default
pre-configuration options please fill the bug in your distribution. The
another possibility is read the documentation and configure your system
how you need.

Sure the SD development team is still open for any nice recommendation
for SD improvement.

Have a nice day



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]